Jorge’s Just Naturally A Naturalist, part one

Jorge Mario Bergoglio has spent his entire adult life awash in the Judeo-Masonic ethos of naturalism. Although he seeks to wrap himself up in a self-righteously and ostentatiously “humble” concern for the “poor,” the Argentine Apostate does not look at the poor through the supernatural lenses of the Holy Faith but through the mere eyes of the body, believing that the satisfaction of their temporal needs alone is all that is required by what he contends is “Christian charity. Indeed, Bergoglio goes to great and obsessive lengths to demonstrate that one must put aside what he thinks are “obsessive” concerns over doctrine, morals, forms, rules and structures to concentrate solely on the temporal, that is, earthly, needs of “the people” in the circumstances of the “existential peripheries” in which they live.

The false “pontiff” has made his completely Modernist view of “the poor” the hallmark of his now-thirteen month “Petrine Minister” as the head of the counterfeit church of conciliarism. As with everything that comes out of his mouth, however there is not an ounce of originality in any of it as he is simple parroting the revolutionary slogans that he learned from his Jesuit mentors in the late-1950s and the 1960s.

Consider, for example, an address that he gave on Saturday, April 12, 2014, Saturday of Passion Week, to the “Pontifical” Committee for Historical Sciences in which he said that it was important for historians to help  pastors “discern” what “the Holy Spirit wants to say to today’s church”:

“In your studies and your teaching, you are confronted in particular with the affairs of the Church which walks in time, with her glorious history of evangelization, of hope, of daily struggle, of a life consumed in service, of constancy in toilsome work, as well as of infidelity, of denials, of sins.” (History is Life’s Teacher’.)
 
“The study of history indeed represents one of the paths for the impassioned search for the truth, which has always pervaded man’s soul”, said the Pope in his audience with the participants in the plenary assembly of the Pontifical Committee for Historical Sciences, which celebrates its 60th anniversary this year. “Your research, marked both by a genuine passion for the Church and by sincere love for the truth, can be of great help to those who have the task of discerning what the Holy Spirit wants to say to today’s Church. … In your encounter and collaboration with researchers from every culture and religion, you can offer a specific contribution to the dialogue between the Church and the contemporary world”. (THE STUDY OF HISTORY, ONE OF THE PATHS TO THE TRUTH.)
 
As the hour is late and the demands of the moment are many, an uncharacteristic, although not entirely without precedent, brevity is in order here.
 
First, the full English translation of this address is not available at this time. The fragmented press reports cited above, however, do provide us with yet another clue as to the fact that Jorge Mario Bergoglio believes that what he thinks is the Catholic Church has been guilty of “infidelities, “denials” and “sins.”
 
While it is possible that this Modernist’s imprecision in the  language or incompleteness of the press reports on the full context of his remarks make any definitive statement on these words problematic, there is, however, precedent for Jorge Mario Bergoglio stating publicly that he believes that the Catholic Church is capable of being filled with “faults” as part of her very Divine Constitution, something that is, of course, heretical as Holy Mother Church is the spotless, virginal Mystical Spouse of her Divine Founder, Invisible Head and Mystical Bridegroom, Our Blessed and Lord Saviour Jesus Christ.
 
Although I realize that not many people have read One Year of Revolutionary Rhetoric and Activity, part six, a little flashback is provided there of what the Argentine Apostate said seven about the “faults” of Holy Mother Church:
 
Do we love the Church as we love our mothers, also taking into account her defects? All mothers have defects, we all have defects, but when we speak of our mother’s defects we gloss over them, we love her as she is. And the Church also has her defects: but we love her just as a mother. Do we help her to be more beautiful, more authentic, more in harmony with the Lord? I leave you with these questions, but don’t forget your homework: go find the date of your Baptism, carry it in your heart and celebrate it. (The Church Is A Mother.)
 
Yes, Jorge Mario Bergoglio believes that the Catholic Church has “defects” as part of her own very constitution. This is what it is eminently fair to construe his recent remarks to his committee of historians as referring to what he thinks is the Catholic Church’s institutional faults, defects and “sins,” that her “structures” have caused injustices and the emphases of our true popes on Faith, Worship and Morals have caused “the poor” to suffer and experience “alienation” from “belonging” to the Church. Although he keeps protesting that he is not a Marxist, his very view of the Church, apart being heretical and blasphemous, is expressed in the language of a revolutionary anticlericalist.
 
Second, Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s revolutionary, anticlericalist view of what he thinks is the Catholic Church, which flies in the face of the perennial teaching of Holy Mother Church, expressed under the infallible guidance of the Third Person of the Most Blessed Trinity, God the Holy Ghost, and the constant teaching of her Fathers and Doctors, was dissected and condemned by Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis, June 29, 1943:
 

65. For this reason We deplore and condemn the pernicious error of those who dream of an imaginary Church, a kind of society that finds its origin and growth in charity, to which, somewhat contemptuously, they oppose another, which they call juridical. But this distinction which they introduce is false: for they fail to understand that the reason which led our Divine Redeemer to give to the community of man He founded the constitution of a Society, perfect of its kind and containing all the juridical and social elements -namely, that He might perpetuate on earth the saving work of Redemption– was also the reason why He willed it to be enriched with the heavenly gifts of the Paraclete. The Eternal Father indeed willed it to be the “kingdom of the Son of his predilection;”but it was to be a real kingdom, in which all believers should make Him the entire offering of their intellect and will,and humbly and obediently model themselves on Him, Who for our sake “was made obedient unto death.”There can, then, be no real opposition or conflict between the invisible mission of the Holy Spirit and the juridical commission of Ruler and Teacher received from Christ, since they mutually complement and perfect each other — as do the body and soul in man — and proceed from our one Redeemer who not only said as He breathed on the Apostles “Receive ye the Holy Spirit,”but also clearly commanded: “As the Father hath sent me, I also send you”; and again: “He that heareth you heareth me.”

 

66. And if at times there appears in the Church something that indicates the weakness of our human nature, it should not be attributed to her juridical constitution, but rather to that regrettable inclination to evil found in each individual, which its Divine Founder permits even at times in the most exalted members of His Mystical Body, for the purpose of testing the virtue of the shepherds no less than of the flocks, and that all may increase the merit of their Christian faith. For, as We said above, Christ did not wish to exclude sinners from His Church; hence if some of her members are suffering from spiritual maladies, that is no reason why we should lessen our love for the Church, but rather a reason why we should increase our devotion to her members. Certainly the loving Mother is spotless in the Sacraments, by which she gives birth to and nourishes her children; in the faith which she has always preserved inviolate; in her sacred laws imposed on all; in the evangelical counsels which she recommends; in those heavenly gifts and extraordinary graces through which, with inexhaustible fecundity, she generates hosts of martyrs, virgins and confessors. But it cannot be laid to her charge if some members fall, weak or wounded. In their name she prays to God daily: “Forgive us our trespasses”; and with the brave heart of a mother she applies herself at once to the work of nursing them back to spiritual health. When therefore we call the Body of Jesus Christ “mystical,” the very meaning of the word conveys a solemn warning. It is a warning that echoes in these words of St. Leo: “Recognize, O Christian, your dignity, and being made a sharer of the divine nature go not back to your former worthlessness along the way of unseemly conduct. Keep in mind of what Head and of what Body you are a member.” (Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis, June 29, 1943.)

Jorge Mario Bergoglio remains what has been throughout his life as a lay Jesuit revolutionary: a heretic.

Third, the currently reigning universal public face of apostasy’s praising historians for supposedly helping pastors “discern” what the “Holy Spirit wants to say to today’s Church” means, as has been noted on this site endless times in the past thirteen months, that the Third Person of the Most Blessed Trinity “blows where He wills,” “choosing” to teach one thing for around nineteen hundred years before “changing” His direction.

This is, of course, both blasphemous and heretical as it makes a mockery of the following pronouncements made under God the Holy Ghost’s infallible guidance:

Indeed you will accomplish this perfectly if, as the duty of your office demands, you attend to yourselves and to doctrine and meditate on these wordsnovelty” and the admonition of Pope Agatho: “nothing of the things appointed ought to be diminished; nothing changed; nothing added; but they must be preserved both as regards expression and meaning.” Therefore may the unity which is built upon the See of Peter as on a sure foundation stand firm. May it be for all a wall and a security, a safe port, and a treasury of countless blessings. To check the audacity of those who attempt to infringe upon the rights of this Holy See or to sever the union of the churches with the See of Peter, instill in your people a zealous confidence in the papacy and sincere veneration for it. As St. Cyprian wrote: “He who abandons the See of Peter on which the Church was founded, falsely believes himself to be a part of the Church. (Pope Gregory XVI, Mirari Vos, August 15, 1832.)

 

In the Catholic Church Christianity is Incarnate. It identifies Itself with that perfect, spiritual, and, in its own order, sovereign society, which is the Mystical Body of Jesus Christ and which has for Its visible head the Roman Pontiff, successor of the Prince of the Apostles. It is the continuation of the mission of the Savior, the daughter and the heiress of His Redemption. It has preached the Gospel, and has defended it at the price of Its blood, and strong in the Divine assistance and of that immortality which has been promised it, It makes no terms with error but remains faithful to the commands which  it has received, to carry the doctrine of Jesus Christ to the uttermost limits of the world and to the end of time, and to protect it in its inviolable integrity. (Pope Leo XIII, A Review of His Pontificate, March 19, 1902.)

 

Would that they had but displayed less zeal and energy in propagating it! But such is their activity and such their unwearying labor on behalf of their cause, that one cannot but be pained to see them waste such energy in endeavoring to ruin the Church when they might have been of such service to her had their efforts been better directed. Their artifices to delude men’s minds are of two kinds, the first to remove obstacles from their path, the second to devise and apply actively and patiently every resource that can serve their purpose. They recognize that the three chief difficulties which stand in their way are the scholastic method of philosophy, the authority and tradition of the Fathers, and the magisterium of the Church, and on these they wage unrelenting war. Against scholastic philosophy and theology they use the weapons of ridicule and contempt. Whether it is ignorance or fear, or both, that inspires this conduct in them, certain it is that the passion for novelty is always united in them with hatred of scholasticism, and there is no surer sign that a man is tending to Modernism than when he begins to show his dislike for the scholastic method. Let the Modernists and their admirers remember the proposition condemned by Pius IX: “The method and principles which have served the ancient doctors of scholasticism when treating of theology no longer correspond with the exigencies of our time or the progress of science.” They exercise all their ingenuity in an effort to weaken the force and falsify the character of tradition, so as to rob it of all its weight and authority. But for Catholics nothing will remove the authority of the second Council of Nicea, where it condemns those “who dare, after the impious fashion of heretics, to deride the ecclesiastical traditions, to invent novelties of some kind…or endeavor by malice or craft to overthrow any one of the legitimate traditions of the Catholic Church“; nor that of the declaration of the fourth Council of Constantinople: “We therefore profess to preserve and guard the rules bequeathed to the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, by the Holy and most illustrious Apostles, by the orthodox Councils, both general and local, and by everyone of those divine interpreters, the Fathers and Doctors of the Church.” Wherefore the Roman Pontiffs, Pius IV and Pius IX, ordered the insertion in the profession of faith of the following declaration: “I most firmly admit and embrace the apostolic and ecclesiastical traditions and other observances and constitutions of the Church.” (Pope Saint Pius X, Pascendi Dominici Gregis, September 8, 1907.)

 

Fourthly, I sincerely hold that the doctrine of faith was handed down to us from the apostles through the orthodox Fathers in exactly the same meaning and always in the same purport. Therefore, I entirely reject the heretical’ misrepresentation that dogmas evolve and change from one meaning to another different from the one which the Church held previously. . . .

Finally, I declare that I am completely opposed to the error of the modernists who hold that there is nothing divine in sacred tradition; or what is far worse, say that there is, but in a pantheistic sense, with the result that there would remain nothing but this plain simple fact-one to be put on a par with the ordinary facts of history-the fact, namely, that a group of men by their own labor, skill, and talent have continued through subsequent ages a school begun by Christ and his apostles. I firmly hold, then, and shall hold to my dying breath the belief of the Fathers in the charism of truth, which certainly is, was, and always will be in the succession of the episcopacy from the apostles. The purpose of this is, then, not that dogma may be tailored according to what seems better and more suited to the culture of each age; rather, that the absolute and immutable truth preached by the apostles from the beginning may never be believed to be different, may never be understood in any other way.

 

I promise that I shall keep all these articles faithfully, entirely, and sincerely, and guard them inviolate, in no way deviating from them in teaching or in any way in word or in writing. Thus I promise, this I swear, so help me God. (The Oath Against Modernism, September 1, 1910.)

 

For this reason it is that all who are truly Christ’s believe, for example, the Conception of the Mother of God without stain of original sin with the same faith as they believe the mystery of the August Trinity, and the Incarnation of our Lord just as they do the infallible teaching authority of the Roman Pontiff, according to the sense in which it was defined by the Ecumenical Council of the Vatican. Are these truths not equally certain, or not equally to be believed, because the Church has solemnly sanctioned and defined them, some in one age and some in another, even in those times immediately before our own? Has not God revealed them all? For the teaching authority of the Church, which in the divine wisdom was constituted on earth in order that revealed doctrines might remain intact for ever, and that they might be brought with ease and security to the knowledge of men, and which is daily exercised through the Roman Pontiff and the Bishops who are in communion with him, has also the office of defining, when it sees fit, any truth with solemn rites and decrees, whenever this is necessary either to oppose the errors or the attacks of heretics, or more clearly and in greater detail to stamp the minds of the faithful with the articles of sacred doctrine which have been explained. But in the use of this extraordinary teaching authority no newly invented matter is brought in, nor is anything new added to the number of those truths which are at least implicitly contained in the deposit of Revelation, divinely handed down to the Church: only those which are made clear which perhaps may still seem obscure to some, or that which some have previously called into question is declared to be of faith. (Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos, January 6, 1928.)

 

39. But our Divine Savior governs and guides the Society which He founded directly and personally also. For it is He who reigns within the minds and hearts of men, and bends and subjects their wills to His good pleasure, even when rebellious. “The heart of the King is in the hand of the Lord; whithersoever he will, he shall turn it.”By this interior guidance He, the “Shepherd and Bishop of our souls,”not only watches over individuals but exercises His providence over the universal Church, whether by enlightening and giving courage to the Church’s rulers for the loyal and effective performance of their respective duties, or by singling out from the body of the Church — especially when times are grave — men and women of conspicuous holiness, who may point the way for the rest of Christendom to the perfecting of His Mystical Body. Moreover from heaven Christ never ceases to look down with especial love on His spotless Spouse so sorely tried in her earthly exile; and when He sees her in anger, saves her from the tempestuous sea either Himself or through the ministry of His angels, or through her whom we invoke as the Help of Christians, or through other heavenly advocates, and in calm and tranquil waters comforts her with the peace “which surpasseth all understanding.” (Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis, June 29, 1943.)

 
Fourth, Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s use of history to re-read and “purify” the past is quintessentially Modernist.
 
Who says so?
 
None other than Pope Saint Pius X:
 
17. It would be a great mistake, nevertheless, to suppose that, according to these theories, one is allowed to believe that faith and science are entirely independent of each other. On the side of science that is indeed quite true and correct, but it is quite otherwise with regard to faith, which is subject to science, not on one but on three grounds. For in the first place it must be observed that in every religious fact, when one takes away the divine reality and the experience of it which the believer possesses, everything else, and especially the religious formulas, belongs to the sphere of phenomena and therefore falls under the control of science. Let the believer go out of the world if he will, but so long as he remains in it, whether he like it or not, he cannot escape from the laws, the observation, the judgments of science and of history. Further, although it is contended that God is the object of faith alone, the statement refers only to the divine reality, not to the idea of God. The latter also is subject to science which, while it philosophizes in what is called the logical order, soars also to the absolute and the ideal. It is therefore the right of philosophy and of science to form its knowledge concerning the idea of God, to direct it in its evolution and to purify it of any extraneous elements which may have entered into it. Hence we have the Modernist axiom that the religious evolution ought to be brought into accord with the moral and intellectual, or as one whom they regard as their leader has expressed it, ought to be subject to it. Finally, man does not suffer a dualism to exist in himself, and the believer therefore feels within him an impelling need so to harmonize faith with science that it may never oppose the general conception which science sets forth concerning the universe. (Pope Saint Pius X, Pascendi Dominci Gregis, September 8, 1907.)
 
Pope Saint Pius X, the farm boy from Riese, Italy, who had a genuine love for the poor as he cared for the salvation of their immortal souls, realizing that there is no salvation whatsoever in being poor or rich, which is part of the subject of part two of this commentary for posting tomorrow, Spy Wednesday, assessed with great precision the exact Modernist views that have been held and expressed by each of the conciliar “popes,” including Jorge Mario Bergoglio three days ago.
 
There is a reason for this.
 
Giuseppe Melchior Sarto was a Catholic, Jorge Mario Bergoglio is not.
 
We continue to mourn for our own sins and to thank Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ for the ineffable mercy and love He has shown for us by undertaking His fearful Passion and Death on the wood of the Holy Cross to make atonement for our sins as He offered Himself, the Spotless, Innocent Lamb, up to His Co-Eternal, Co-Equal God the Father, to make possible for us our very salvation. May we continue to cling His Most Sorrowful Mother, especially by meditating upon the Sorrowful Mysteries of her Most Holy Rosary, this Holy Week so that we will enter deep into the sacrificial love that Our Lord showed for us once in time and that He extends to us in time in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and in all of the other sacraments, including most especially, the Sacrament of Penance.
 
sn’t it time to pray a Rosary now?

Viva Cristo Rey! Vivat Christus Rex!

Our Lady of Sorrows, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.