Let it be stipulated at the beginning of this commentary that Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro is the most unrepentantly bold statist and appeaser in the history of the United States of America.

Let it be stipulated also that Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro is the most lawless statist in the history of the United States of America.

Let it be stipulated finally that none of the naturalists who have served as President of the United States of America prior to him, try as many of them did (see Not A Mention of Christ the King), prior to Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro have been as contemptuous of the security of the borders of the United States of American that he has been.

When all is said and done, however, Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro is nothing other than The End Product of Americanism.

Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro remains unrepentantly righteous in his support of ObamaDeathCare as he denies any wrongdoing concerning the Fast and Furious gun running scandal or United States Attorney General Eric Holder’s coverup of it, the scandals associated with “green energy” projects such as Solyndra, his administration’s relentless efforts to force religious institutions to provide health insurance coverage for contraception and sterilization to their employees, his administration’s ongoing coverups of the impeachable offenses committed as American personnel came under attack from terrorists as they were offered no assistance by their government, whose leaders then lied about what had happened, his administration’s efforts to use the Internal Revenue Service and the United States Department of Justice as instruments to intimidate political opponents and to indemnify the wrongdoing of its own officials and their supporters, and his administration’s many and varied rank violations of the Constitution of the United States of America, including his making a “recess” appointment to a new Consumer Financial Protection Board even though the United States Senate was in session (see Hugo Chavez Ortega Obama).

The Constitution?

What’s that?

To reject the sweet yoke of the Social Reign of Christ the King is to live under the iron rule of men whose minds are not conformed to the Sacred Deposit of Faith that Our King has entrusted exclusively to His Catholic Church for Its infallible explication and eternal safekeeping.

To reject the sweet yoke of the Social Reign of Christ the King is to live under the iron rule of men whose hearts are not consecrated to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary.

To reject the sweet yoke of the Social Reign of Christ the King is to live under the iron rule of men who believe that they can “plan” or “will” “solutions” to domestic and international difficulties, convincing us that they need more and more of our money to do so.

To reject the sweet yoke of the Social Reign of Christ the King is to live under the iron rule of men who wind up having no regard even for the constitutions and just civil laws that they have sworn to uphold (see He Swore to Uphold the Constitution, Not the United Nations and Taking Refuge in Racism to Break the Laws of God and Man).

To reject the sweet yoke of the Social Reign of Christ the King is to live under the iron rule of men who are mad, men who never want to admit that their schemes for prosperity at home and for peace in the world are doomed to miserable failure time after time after time (see All Caesars Go Mad.)

It is in this context that one must understand the despicable “trade” negotiated by President Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro and Secretary of State John F. Kerry for the return of a deserter, Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl (U.S. Army) in exchange for five Taliban prisoners who have been held at the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp, where they have undergone “enhanced interrogation,” as a result of the commitment of American ground troops to Afghanistan by then President George Walker Bush on October 7, 2001.

Reality for Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro is whatever he wants it to be. If he and his minions want to refer to Bowe Bergdahl as a hero and as one who served in the United States Army with “honor and distinction,” well, then, it must be so. Anyone who disagrees with caesar’s gratuitous and patently false statements must be motivated by “racism,” of course,” as they are “veritable extremists” who want to “destroy” the “good” that caesar has done for the country.

Alas, each of our presidents has been a positivist, making statements that the citizens are expected to accept because a sitting president has made them.

Obama/Soetoro’s immediate predecessor, George Walker Bush, made all kinds of false statements in the aftermath of the terrible events of Tuesday, September 11, 2001. He expected us to swallow the government line about the attacks on the twin towers of the World Trade Center in the City of New York, New York, and on the Pentagon in Alexandria, Virginia, that day, as many unanswered questions, not the least of which concern the collapse of the twin towers as though they had been imploded, remained. B

Bush the lesser expected Americans to stand by passing and accept limitations upon their legitimate liberties by means of the so-called “Patriot Act” that exploited fears about “national security” in the immediate aftermath of the tragic events of September 11, 2001.

Bush, the “compassionate statist,” wanted Americans to believe that the xenophobic President of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, was somehow involved with the events of September 11, 2001, and was part of an alleged “axis of evil” that required the armed forces of the United States of America to invade and occupy that country to destroy to Hussein’s alleged “stockpile of weapons of mass destruction” and to prevent him from getting hold of the components to build a nuclear weapon. Bush even went so far as to claim in an address before a joint session of Congress that Hussein was attempting to purchased enriched uranium from the government of the country of Niger in Africa, something that was patently false on its face.

Bush the Younger expected Americans to believe that “democracy” could built in Iraq and Afghanistan, whose forbidding mountainous terrain provided challenges for the British between 1843 and 1919 and proved to be too much for occupiers from the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics from 1979-1989. We did, after all, have the “superior form” of government, right?

Some of George Walker Bush’s Catholic apologists, including some prominent traditionally-minded Catholics, sought to portray the American invasion and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan as a veritable “crusade” against “Mohammedanism” when it was nothing of the sort.

Mohammedans were enabled by George Walker Bush’s “international coalition” on March 20, 2003, and thereafter to kill Catholics and attack and destroy Catholic churches.

Mohammedans from Iran poured into Iraq to attack Catholics and Orthodox Christians as they made strongholds for themselves to attack American military forces that were placed into harm’s way for no good purpose.

What has become of all of the blood shed, all of the destruction wrought, all of lives–American, Iraqi and Afghan–torn apart (wives and children losing fathers or mothers or both, divorces caused by infidelity at the front lines, large numbers of service personnel killed by enemy fire, wanton torture used on innocent civilians, innocent civilians targeted for destruction without a word of regret. etc)?

Well, take a look at what is happening in Iraq at this time as the Sunni Mohammedans prepare to seize control of Baghdad from the Shiite Mohammedans who have had the backing of the government of the Islamic Republic of Iraq?

BAGHDAD — Sunni militants extended their control over parts of northern and western Iraq on Wednesday as Iraqi government forces crumbled in disarray. The militants overran the city of Tikrit, seized facilities in the strategic oil refining town of Baiji, and threatened an important Shiite shrine in Samarra as they moved south toward Baghdad.

The remarkably rapid advance of the Sunni militants, who on Tuesday seized the northern city of Mosul as Iraqi forces fled or surrendered, reflects the spillover of the Sunni insurgency in Syria and the inability of Iraq’s Shiite-led government to pacify the country after American forces departed in 2011 following eight years of war and occupation.

By late Wednesday, witnesses in Samarra, 70 miles north of Baghdad, were reporting that the militants, many of them aligned with the radical Islamic State of Iraq and Syria or ISIS, were on the outskirts of the city. They said the militants demanded that forces loyal to the government leave the city or a sacred Shiite shrine there would be destroyed. Samarra is known for the shrine, the al-Askari Mosque, which was severely damaged in a 2006 bombing during the height of the American-led occupation. That event touched off sectarian mayhem between the country’s Sunni Arab minority and its Shiite majority.

Members of Shiite militias were on high alert in Baghdad, and many were reported headed north to Samarra, even though the central government declared a 10 p.m. curfew in the capital and surrounding towns. An influential Iraqi Shiite cleric, Moktada al-Sadr, called for the formation of a special force to defend religious sites in Iraq. The authorities in neighboring Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, canceled all visas and flights for pilgrims to Baghdad and intensified security on the Iran-Iraq border, Iran’s official Islamic Republic News Agency reported.

Insurgents also were holding 80 Turkish citizens seized in Mosul over the last two days, inclusing the Turkish consul general, other diplomats and at least three children, the Turkish government said. Thirty-one of the Turkish hostages were truck drivers who had been transporting fuel to a power plant in Mosul.

The hostage-taking raised the possibility that Turkey, a NATO ally that borders both Syria and Iraq, would become directly entangled in the fast-moving crisis. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey was holding an emergency meeting with top security officials, and the Turkish foreign minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, cut short a trip to New York and was returning to Ankara. “No one should try to test the limits of Turkey’s strength,” Mr. Davutoglu said in a statement.

Turkey has long taken an interest in northern Iraq for economic reasons and because of the sizable and often restive Kurdish minority, which straddles the border and controls a region of Iraq east of Mosul.

Amid the collapse of the Iraqi army in Mosul, Tikrit and other northern cities, questions were raised about the possibility of a conspiracy in the military to deliberately surrender. Witnesses reported some remarkable scenes in Tikrit, where soldiers handed over their weapons and uniforms peacefully to militants who ordinarily would have been expected to kill government soldiers on the spot.

Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, a Shiite, suggested the possibility of disloyalty in the army when he exhorted Iraqi citizens on Tuesday to take up arms against the Sunni insurgents.

Residents of Baiji, a city of 200,000 about 110 miles south of Mosul, awoke Wednesday to find that government checkpoints had been abandoned and that insurgents, arriving in a column of 60 vehicles, were taking control of parts of the city without firing a shot, the security officials said. Peter Bouckaert, the emergency services director for Human Rights Watch, said in a post on Twitter that the militants had seized the Baiji power station, which supplies electricity to Baghdad, Kirkuk and Salahuddin Province.

In Tikrit, the home town of Saddam Hussein, residents said the militants attacked in the afternoon from three directions: east, west and north. Residents said there were brief exchanges of gunfire, and then police officers and soldiers shed their uniforms, put on civilian clothing and fled through residential areas to avoid the militants, while others gave up their weapons and uniforms willingly.

On Wednesday, the insurgents claimed to have taken control of the entire province of Nineveh, Agence France-Presse reported, and there were reports of militants executing government soldiers in the Kirkuk region. Atheel al-Nujaifi, the governor of the province, criticized the Iraqi army commanders in Mosul, saying they had misled the government about the situation in the city.

Iraq’s foreign minister, Hoshyar Zebari, was quoted on Wednesday as saying his country’s Kurdish minority would “work together” with Baghdad’s forces to “flush out these foreign fighters.”

At a meeting of Arab and European foreign ministers in Athens, Mr. Zebari, himself a Kurd, called the insurgents’ strike “a serious, mortal threat,” adding: “The response has to be soon. There has to be a quick response to what has happened.”

Iraqi Kurds are concentrated in the autonomous region of Kurdistan, where security is maintained by a disciplined and fiercely loyal fighting force, the pesh merga, that has not yet become involved in the latest clashes.

In a further indication of the regional dimensions of the crisis, the government of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria, facing the same jihadist adversary in its civil war against a broader array of armed foes, expressed solidarity with the Iraqi authorities and armed forces, the official SANA news agency reported.

Word of the latest militant advance came as a United Nations agency reported that 500,000 people had fled Mosul — Iraq’s second-largest city, with a population of about 2 million — after the militants, spilling over the border from Syria, captured military bases, police stations, banks and provincial headquarters.

The International Organization for Migration, based in Geneva, said the civilians had mainly fled on foot, because the militants would not let them use vehicles and had taken control of the airport. Roughly the same number were displaced from Anbar Province in western Iraq as the militants gained ground there, the organization said.

On Tuesday the insurgents, reinforced with captured weaponry abandoned by the fleeing government forces, raised their black banner over streets in Mosul littered with the bodies of soldiers, police officers and civilians. The success of the militant attack was the most stunning development in a rapidly widening insurgency straddling the porous border of Iraq and Syria.

Mr. Maliki has ordered a state of emergency for the entire country and called on friendly governments for assistance in a quickly deteriorating situation. His weak central government is struggling to mount a defense, a problem made markedly more dangerous by the defections of hundreds of trained soldiers and the loss of their vehicles, uniforms and weapons.

Security officials said the militant drive toward Baiji began late on Tuesday with brief clashes a few miles north of the town before the insurgents overran a security post, captured vehicles and set buildings on fire.

hey did not kill the soldiers or policemen who handed over their weapons, uniform and their military I.D.,” a security official in Tikrit said on Wednesday before the militants reached that city; he spoke on the condition of anonymity. “They just took these things and asked them to leave,” the official said.

The rising insurgency presented a new quandary for the Obama administration, which has faced sharp criticism for its recent swap of five Taliban officers for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl and must now answer questions about the death of five Americans by friendly fire in Afghanistan on Monday night.

Critics have long contended that America’s withdrawal of troops from Iraq, without leaving even a token force, invited an insurgent revival. (Tikrit Falls; Reports of Battle in Samarra, 70 Miles From the Capital.)

Just how long were the armed forces of the United States of America supposed to stay in Iraq to prop up a corrupt regime that is backed by the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran? Forever?

Why should we be surprised that Mohammedans in Iraq and Afghanistan and Syria and elsewhere are doing what comes naturally to them: killing, which is an integral part of the false, blasphemous “religion” founded by their false “prophet,” Mohammed?

How many more Americans should have died or have had their arms and legs blown off or have returned home to find themselves suffering from all manner of emotional disorders related to their time in battle?

How many more Americans should have returned home to overwhelm a Veteran’s Affairs hospitals to such an extent that a massive effort coverup the scandalously long waits for veterans to be examined, no less receive treatment, after having served in needless, unjust, immoral and unconstitutional wars?

It was to divert attention from his administration’s incompetence and deception in providing medical care to America’s military veterans that the administration of Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro sought to trade five Taliban prisoners captured in Afghanistan for Army deserter Bowe Bergdahl. Caesar’s efforts to divert attention from the scandals of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, however, backfired when the facts of Bergdahl’s desertion, including the revelation that six and as many as fourteen Americans may have been killed while looking for this deserter, became known.

As always, of course, caesar doubled down and stuck righteously to his story without regard for the outrage that he had caused or that the prisoners, who will live for a year in Qatar before being free to return to the battlefield in Afghanistan to kill more Americans. This is what caesars do when their plans go awry: they remain self-righteous in their defense of errors that they can never admit, perhaps not even to themselves are in fact errors.

Then again, as noted earlier in this commentary, Americans should never have been put on the ground in Afghanistan in the first place. As is the case in Iraq, the United States of America has spent over a trillion dollars (that’s right, one trillion dollars) to prop up the government of Hamid Karzai, who has pocketed much of the money himself (see Bag Man in a Karakul Hat). The total fiscal costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which has spilled over into Pakistan, totals close to four trillion dollars.

As I wrote in the January 31, 2003, issue of The Remnant six weeks before the onset of the unjust, immoral and unconstitutional American invasion and occupation of Iraq and nearly seventeen months after American military operations had begun in Afghanistan, “For what?” To what good end? For what?

In the case of George Walker Bush, the American invasion and occupation of Iraq was supposed to make the Middle East “safe for America’s only ally” in that region, the murderous State of Israel whose Zionist leaders have treated Palestinians and other Arabs, whether Christian or Mohammedan, as subhumans (believing Talmudists do believe that non-Jews are subhumans, of course).

How did that work out?

Reflexive support by one presidential regime after another for the murderous policies of the State of Israel has emboldened faithful, believing Mohammedans to attack Americans and other foreign nations whenever the opportunity strikes. These attacks have increased around the world, not decreased, as a result of “America’s War on Terror.” No Americans would have died in Iraq or Afghanistan or Pakistan if American forces had not been committed there for no good purpose and in full violation of the tenets of the Just War Theory (see Different Chief, Same War Drums).

Bush also believed that his “wars” to spread the joys of “American exceptionalism” would make the United States of America more “secure”?

How has that worked out for the innocent preborn or for those killed in Fort Hood I or Fort Hood II or the Washington Navy Yard or at the Boston Marathon or at any number of schools and universities?

Nations whose laws permit attacks on innocent human life, whether by means of chemical or surgical abortions or the execution of starvation and dehydration of innocent human beings or the cruel vivisection of human beings for their body members under the aegis of the medical industry’s manufactured, profit-making myth of “brain death,” and that permit licentiousness to the point of rank perversity to be considered a “human right” can never be made “secure” from the consequences of their daily warfare against the very laws of Christ the King Himself. Never.

Moreover, Over and over again, of course, Caesar Georgii Bushus Ignoramus and Caesar Barackus Obamus Ignoramus assured us that the United States of America was not at war with a supposed “religion of peace,” Mohammedanism:

The terrorists practice a fringe form of Islamic extremism that has been rejected by Muslim scholars and the vast majority of Muslim clerics — a fringe movement that perverts the peaceful teachings of Islam. The terrorists’ directive commands them to kill Christians and Jews, to kill all Americans, and make no distinction among military and civilians, including women and children. . .  .

I also want to speak tonight directly to Muslims throughout the world. We respect your faith. It’s practiced freely by many millions of Americans, and by millions more in countries that America counts as friends. Its teachings are good and peaceful, and those who commit evil in the name of Allah blaspheme the name of Allah. (Applause.) The terrorists are traitors to their own faith, trying, in effect, to hijack Islam itself. The enemy of America is not our many Muslim friends; it is not our many Arab friends. Our enemy is a radical network of terrorists, and every government that supports them. (Applause.)  (George Walker Bush, Address to the Nation, September 20, 2001.)

As we know, these men belonged to al Qaeda – a group of extremists who have distorted and defiled Islam, one of the world’s great religions, to justify the slaughter of innocents. Al Qaeda‘s base of operations was in Afghanistan, where they were harbored by the Taliban – a ruthless, repressive and radical movement that seized control of that country after it was ravaged by years of Soviet occupation and civil war, and after the attention of America and our friends had turned elsewhere.

Just days after 9/11, Congress authorized the use of force against al Qaeda and those who harbored them – an authorization that continues to this day. The vote in the Senate was 98 to 0. The vote in the House was 420 to 1. For the first time in its history, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization invoked Article 5 – the commitment that says an attack on one member nation is an attack on all. And the United Nations Security Council endorsed the use of all necessary steps to respond to the 9/11 attacks. America, our allies and the world were acting as one to destroy al Qaeda’s terrorist network, and to protect our common security. (Barack Hussein Obama,  Address on the War in Afghanistan, December 2, 2009.)

How have Mohammedans respond to these plaudits of their false religions?

Killing Catholics and other Christians in Libya, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nigeria, Kenya and, among other places, The Sudan.

Mohammedanism is a religion of death, not peace.

Mohammedanism is a religion of blasphemy, not love of the true God of Divine Revelation.

Mohammedanism is a religion of hatred of the infidel just as much as Talmudism, not a “religion of love” and “tolerance.”

Indeed, just as our statists of the false opposites of the naturalist “left” and “right” have remained self-righteous in an unrepentant defense of their numerous, blood-stained errors, so have the Zionists of Israel and Mohammedans all over the world remained completely unrepentant about the bloodletting they continue to let loose on their enemies and as they denounce infidels.

Give these monsters of the anti-Incarnational errors of Modernity credit having the courage and the integrity to defend their publicly while persisting in them without any sign of remorse. They even have the courage to defend their false religions publicly.

The Zionists made a point last month of having Jorge Mario Bergoglio do his obeisance at a shrine in honor of Jews killed by terrorist acts in Europe, and they reveled at his “making reparation” at the tomb of Theodore Herzl, the founder of International Zionism, for the “crime” of Pope Saint Pius X having spoken to him as a true and legitimate Successor of Saint Peter who rejected all notion of Judaism’s “enduring validity.”

Talmudism is, of course, a religion of triumphalism. Its adherents are horrified by the sight of the Sign of true triumphalism, the Sign of the Holy Cross upon which Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ wrought our salvation by the shedding of every shedding of His Most Precious Blood. This is why many believing Talmudists believe it is their duty to spit at any crucifix or cross that they see.

Zionism is a political movement based on Israeli triumphalism.

Mohammedanism is also a religion of triumphalism, believing that it has a mission to conquer the world and to crush all infidels in the process.

As noted just above, Catholicism is, of course, the true religion of triumphalism, that of Our Lord’s victory on the wood of the Holy Cross.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio, however, rejects “triumphalism” as opposed to the spirit of “encounter” and “inter-religious dialogue” and “tolerance” and “diversity” in the name of “religious liberty.”

The Zionists reject this entirely.

Mohammedans also reject this entirely, which is why the imam who prayed to his devils in the Vatican Gardens four days ago now, that is, on Pentecost Sunday, June 8, 2014, managed to work in an unscripted “prayer” from the blasphemous Koran to ask the devil named “Allah” to “give us victory over the disbelieving people” (Koran verse; see also the post at Novus Ordo Watch Wire).

You see, the Talmudists and the Mohammedans take their false religions seriously, which is something foreign to the “broad-minded” caesars of the “left” and the “right” to the apostates who comprise the counterfeit church of conciliarism.

Neither Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro or Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who is thought to be “Pope Francis” by almost everyone in the world, can understand who would be opposed to “dialogue” and “diversity,” although each of these terrible men cannot stand criticism and are constantly belittling and caricaturing their opponents, whether real or imagined.

It’s “death to the infidels” for Zionists and for Mohammedans. Indeed, both believe that is necessary to fight to the death to defend their own regimes of falsehood and blasphemy.

Such is foreign to the ears of the lords of Modernity in the world and the lords of Modernism in the counterfeit church of conciliarism, who have welcomed Mohammedans into Europe as the descendants of those who sought to conquer this formerly Catholic continent by force have taken advance of lax immigration laws that were made necessary by Europe’s depopulation as a result of contraception and abortion, both of which have been winked at by most of the conciliar authorities in various places in Europe.

Zionists are not interested in true peace.

Mohammedans are not interested in true peace.

Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soteoro is not interested in true peace.

George Walker Bush was not interested in true peace.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio is not interested in true peace.

True peace is that of Christ the King, Who has taught us that the path to this peace, which is not a peace of this world, runs through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary. This is the essence of Our Lady’s Fatima Message, Heaven’s Peace Plan

Pope Pius XII explained this at the end of the encyclical letter, Ad Caeli Reginam, October 11, 1954, by which he instituted the Feast of the Queenship of the Blessed Virgin Mary:

51. By this Encyclical Letter We are instituting a feast so that all may recognize more clearly and venerate more devoutly the merciful and maternal sway of the Mother of God. We are convinced that this feast will help to preserve, strengthen and prolong that peace among nations which daily is almost destroyed by recurring crises. Is she not a rainbow in the clouds reaching towards God, the pledge of a covenant of peace?[62] “Look upon the rainbow, and bless Him that made it; surely it is beautiful in its brightness. It encompasses the heaven about with the circle of its glory, the hands of the Most High have displayed it.”[63] Whoever, therefore, reverences the Queen of heaven and earth — and let no one consider himself exempt from this tribute of a grateful and loving soul — let him invoke the most effective of Queens, the Mediatrix of peace; let him respect and preserve peace, which is not wickedness unpunished nor freedom without restraint, but a well-ordered harmony under the rule of the will of God; to its safeguarding and growth the gentle urgings and commands of the Virgin Mary impel us.

52. Earnestly desiring that the Queen and Mother of Christendom may hear these Our prayers, and by her peace make happy a world shaken by hate, and may, after this exile show unto us all Jesus, Who will be our eternal peace and joy, to you, Venerable Brothers, and to your flocks, as a promise of God’s divine help and a pledge of Our love, from Our heart We impart the Apostolic Benediction. (Pope Pius XII, Ad Caeli Reginam, October 11, 1954.)

Pope Pius XII’s Act of Consecration to the Immaculate Heart of Mary is one that we should make on a monthly basis:

Most Holy Virgin Mary, tender Mother of men, to fulfill the desires of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the request of the Vicar of Your Son on earth, we consecrate ourselves and our families to your Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart, O Queen of the Most Holy Rosary, and we recommend to You, all the people of our country and all the world.

Please accept our consecration, dearest Mother, and use us as You wish to accomplish Your designs in the world.

O Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, Queen of the Most Holy Rosary, and Queen of the World, rule over us, together with the Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ, Our King. Save us from the spreading flood of modern paganism; kindle in our hearts and homes the love of purity, the practice of a virtuous life, an ardent zeal for souls, and a desire to pray the Rosary more faithfully.

We come with confidence to You, O Throne of Grace and Mother of Fair Love. Inflame us with the same Divine Fire which has inflamed Your own Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart. Make our hearts and homes Your shrine, and through us, make the Heart of Jesus, together with your rule, triumph in every heart and home. Amen.

Yes, a great reward awaits us for our fidelity to the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary and to the Most Sacred Heart of her Divine Son, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, if we persist until our dying breaths in states of Sanctifying Grace. We must keep close to them, therefore, by the time we spend each day outside of Mass before Our Lord in His Real Presence (where we keep company with all of the angels and the saints, including Our Lady Immaculate, the Queen of All Angels and Saints), by our wearing the Brown Scapular and fulfilling the terms associated with it, by wearing the Miraculous Medal, by distributing the Green Scapular and Rosaries and instructional booklets about the Rosary to those God places in our paths on a daily basis–and, most importantly, by our assiduous, reverent and faithful recitation of the Mysteries of Our Lady’s Most Holy Rosary each and every day in our lives.

Those who believe in any other kind of path to peace are simply self-righteous defenders of error who do not realize that they will have to make an account of their rejection of Christ the King at the moment of their Particular Judgment, a moment for which we ourselves must pray every day to have the maternal intercession and protection of Our Lady, out of whose Immaculate Heart was formed the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus.

Viva Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior and Balthasar, pray for us.

Saint John of San Facundo, pray for us.